![]() ![]() Think of the movie "the wizard of oz", nearly every BD copy has been zoomed in to fit a 16x9 display, the movie is originally 1.37:1 (4x3 aspect), its really dumb. Is there a reason why people should look fat or skinny ? If there is one thing i cant stand, it is when people are streaming content using VLC and the native aspect of the content is not preserved distorting the content vertically or horizontally, what is the point in stretching (and distorting) 4x3 content to fit a 16x9 display (or vice versa) ? The other method to fill in these black areas of the display is to simply zoom the content to fill in the black areas but there will be a small loss of content displayed depending on the aspect of the content, if it is 4x3, you will lose an equal amount vertically, if it is 16x9, you will loose an equal amount horizontally. It is preferred to keep the aspect ratio of the content displayed in its native format versus manipulating the displayed content to fit a given area that is not the same aspect as the content as this will distort the video content (stretch it vertically/horizontally). The aspect ratio of the content is preserved if you resize the window to an aspect that is not the same as the content aspect, hence why you are getting the black areas. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |